← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Spagnuolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 30 0 5 5 0.167 0.0188 0.0194 0.0567 0.0586
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 30 1 11 12 0.400 0.0451 0.0445 0.1361 0.1342
2024-25 New York Apple Core EHL 36 1 4 5 0.139 0.0203 0.0195 0.0681 0.0655
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 5 0 1 1 0.200
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 5 0 1 1 0.200
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 5 0 1 1 0.200
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 5 0 1 1 0.200
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 5 0 1 1 0.200
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 5 0 1 1 0.200

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20957
Defenseman overall
#3581
Defenseman born in 2004
#5624
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2021-22
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.