← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Neville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-11 Country: USA
Rivier
MASCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Tilton NE-Prep 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.0594 0.0594 0.1367 0.1367
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.0275 0.0299 0.0714 0.0777
2024-25 EHL 36 9 6 15 0.417 0.0963 0.0978 0.2039 0.2070
2025-26 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits EHL 38 9 9 18 0.474 0.1094 0.1049 0.2318 0.2222
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39255
Forward overall
#2475
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Rivier Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
0.15
actual FR PPG at Rivier
0.00
actual FR PPG at Rivier
0.29
actual FR PPG at Rivier

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.