← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Worst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Elite 43 18 13 31 0.721 0.0537 0.0568 0.1651 0.1746
2023-24 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 44 8 14 22 0.500 0.0564 0.0595 0.1698 0.1790
2024-25 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 39 8 11 19 0.487 0.0550 0.0548 0.1654 0.1647
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 19 1 2 3 0.158
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 19 1 2 3 0.158
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 19 1 2 3 0.158
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 19 1 2 3 0.158
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 19 1 2 3 0.158
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 19 1 2 3 0.158

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35981
Forward overall
#2196
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2023-24
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.