← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Chung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-31 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kingston Wranglers USPHL-Premier 40 6 9 15 0.375 0.0490 0.0501 0.1273 0.1300
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 24 2 10 12 0.500
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 24 2 10 12 0.500
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 24 2 10 12 0.500
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 24 2 10 12 0.500
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 24 2 10 12 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41999
Forward overall
#2538
Forward born in 2006
#3965
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2021-22
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2021-22
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.