IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Chung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kingston Wranglers USPHL-Premier 40 6 9 15 0.375 0.1236 0.1263 0.1276 0.1303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 24 2 10 12 0.500
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 24 2 10 12 0.500
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 24 2 10 12 0.500
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 24 2 10 12 0.500
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 24 2 10 12 0.500
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 — — 24 2 10 12 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41772
Forward overall
#2533
Forward born in 2006
#3964
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Jensen
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Hicks
Manhattanville · 2010-11
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Rutigliano
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.