← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Alma Ameigeiras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-12-06 Country: Argentina Height: 5'4" (162 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Canton
Verbal SUNYAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.05
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0496
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.11
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1202
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

5%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 Purcell Hockey Academy 19U 19U-AAA-W 18 2 1 3 0.167 0.0531 0.0496
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kate Glover USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.167 Harvard
Ellie Larson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG 0.143 RIT
Lauren Niska USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.000 Minnesota Duluth
Sylvie Wallin USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.333 Princeton
Abby Ecker USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG 0.000 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Josee Lundgren 2014-15 · 0.84 PPG 0.143 Concordia MIAC
Megan Juricko 2010-11 · 0.72 PPG 0.167 Wisconsin-River Falls NCHA
Brenna Mjoness 2014-15 · 0.72 PPG 0.167 Concordia MIAC
Catherine Appleyard 2017-18 · 0.13 PPG 0.926 Middlebury NESCAC
Taylor Insley 2023-24 · 0.45 PPG 0.267 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.