← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zander Badger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHLP 42 2 17 19 0.452 0.0519 0.0518 0.1020 0.1018
2023-24 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 41 4 18 22 0.537 0.0702 0.0688 0.1821 0.1785
2024-25 New Jersey Bears EHL 21 0 4 4 0.191 0.0440 0.0420 0.0932 0.0891
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11831
Defenseman overall
#2458
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2021-22
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2014-15
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2009-10
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.