← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Perkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Champlin Park USHS-MN 22 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Champlin Park USHS-MN 24 2 6 8 0.333 0.0422 0.0422 0.0810 0.0810
2024-25 Champlin Park USHS-MN 28 9 17 26 0.929 0.1176 0.1176 0.2256 0.2256
2025-26 Minnesota Squatch USPHL-Premier 43 15 24 39 0.907 0.1186 0.1215 0.3078 0.3152
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 3 0 1 1 0.333
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 3 0 1 1 0.333
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 3 0 1 1 0.333
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 3 0 1 1 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23242
Forward overall
#734
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2011-12
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2018-19
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2020-21
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.