IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Jagels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-20 Country: USA
Franklin Pierce
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 43 0 5 5 0.116 0.0152 0.0150 0.0395 0.0390
2025-26 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 39 5 16 21 0.538 0.0704 0.0660 0.1828 0.1713
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14222
Defenseman overall
#2759
Defenseman born in 2005
#4072
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Franklin Pierce Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mitch Dolese
0.15
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Phil Parker
0.31
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Matthew Toombs
0.56
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Cainan Stevenson
0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Carangelo
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Kleckner
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Newis
Framingham State · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.