IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew LeBlanc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kitchener Rangers OHL 57 6 19 25 0.439 0.2537 0.2653 1.1270 1.1786
2022-23 Niagara IceDogs OHL 57 13 20 33 0.579 0.3349 0.3357 1.4875 1.4912
2023-24 Sarnia Sting OHL 63 16 35 51 0.809 0.4683 0.4471 2.0800 1.9857
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 60 13 17 30 0.500 0.2893 0.2612 1.2848 1.1602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2025-26 · Mercyhurst
+53.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11632
Forward overall
#504
Forward born in 2004
#554
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Fleurent
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.