← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Thibodeau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-13 Country: Canada
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 51 4 5 9 0.176 0.1021 0.1137 0.4535 0.5051
2022-23 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 66 17 22 39 0.591 0.3418 0.3659 1.5183 1.6254
2023-24 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 68 21 39 60 0.882 0.5105 0.5221 2.2673 2.3186
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 57 22 28 50 0.877 0.5075 0.4928 2.2540 2.1887
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 52 16 22 38 0.731 0.4228 0.3893 1.8778 1.7290
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6557
Forward overall
#217
Forward born in 2005
#343
in OHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2024-25
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
BCHL 2024-25
0.24
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
QMJHL 2023-24
0.93
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
QMJHL 2024-25
0.70
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.