IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Bulthaup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-05 Country: USA
Post
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Elite 44 16 22 38 0.864 0.0797 0.0754 0.1978 0.1871
2025-26 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 41 0 8 8 0.195 0.0255 0.0238 0.0662 0.0619
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17049
Defenseman overall
#3130
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Post Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jonathan Meijer
0.25
actual FR PPG at Post
Owen Atkinson
0.18
actual FR PPG at Post
Justin Brown
0.00
actual FR PPG at Post
William Francis
0.18
actual FR PPG at Post

D2/3 Comparables

Eli Hernandez
Trine · 2018-19
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Dobberstein
Lawrence · 2016-17
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Mettler
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.