← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Pitters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-28 Country: USA
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Flint Firebirds OHL 9 0 4 4 0.444 0.2571 0.2847 1.1419 1.2646
2022-23 Flint Firebirds OHL 55 3 3 6 0.109 0.0631 0.0672 0.2803 0.2983
2023-24 Idaho Falls Spud Kings NCDC 20 13 5 18 0.900 0.3669 0.3878 0.7234 0.7646
2024-25 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 34 9 13 22 0.647 0.2377 0.2400 0.6830 0.6896
2025-26 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 24 30 54 0.982 0.3607 0.3465 1.0363 0.9954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9859
Forward overall
#421
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2023-24
0.10
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
SJHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2015-16
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.