← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coster Dunn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-13 Country: Canada
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 11 2 1 3 0.273 0.1327 0.1477 0.6691 0.7445
2022-23 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 58 4 6 10 0.172 0.0839 0.0894 0.4230 0.4509
2023-24 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 37 8 12 20 0.540 0.2630 0.2674 1.3262 1.3484
2024-25 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 67 26 29 55 0.821 0.3994 0.3847 2.0142 1.9403
2025-26 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 62 25 30 55 0.887 0.4316 0.3958 2.1767 1.9961
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10132
Forward overall
#438
Forward born in 2005
#362
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SJHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2023-24
0.10
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
SJHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.