IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Sheridan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Worcester Jr. Railers USPHL-Premier 18 1 4 5 0.278 0.0313 0.0304 0.0943 0.0916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18463
Defenseman overall
#3116
Defenseman born in 2006
#5096
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Beck
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Nickels
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Larsson
Salem State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.