IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anders Alves Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-05 Country: USA
Franklin Pierce
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Providence Capitals EHL 35 4 7 11 0.314 0.0726 0.0743 0.1538 0.1573
2025-26 Providence Capitals EHL 49 13 18 31 0.633 0.1462 0.1413 0.3096 0.2991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8560
Defenseman overall
#1939
Defenseman born in 2005
#1075
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Franklin Pierce Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Vito Carlo
0.33
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Declan House
0.47
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Kade Maddock
0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Sean Gargin
0.36
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce

D2/3 Comparables

Trey Sauder
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Brierley
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenneth Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.