← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Bishop Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-17 Country: Canada
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Sudbury Wolves OHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Sudbury Wolves OHL 32 0 4 4 0.125 0.0723 0.0753 0.3212 0.3346
2023-24 Saginaw Spirit OHL 66 4 6 10 0.151 0.0876 0.0871 0.3893 0.3869
2024-25 Saginaw Spirit OHL 62 3 14 17 0.274 0.1586 0.1494 0.7046 0.6639
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 67 1 10 11 0.164 0.0950 0.0847 0.4219 0.3763
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15070
Defenseman overall
#2870
Defenseman born in 2005
#1404
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2017-18
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.08
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
NAHL 2023-24
0.10
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.