← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Pi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 41 2 15 17 0.415 0.0383 0.0400 0.0949 0.0992
2025-26 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0218 0.0225 0.0566 0.0585
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 20 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 20 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 20 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 20 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21730
Defenseman overall
#2612
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2008-09
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2006-07
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.