IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Roper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-07-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2562 0.2798 0.7538 0.8232
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 40 0 6 6 0.150 0.0384 0.0400 0.1131 0.1179
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2013-14 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2012-13 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 18 2 3 5 0.278
2011-12 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2011-12 · Connecticut College
+205.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26950
Defenseman overall
#2156
Defenseman born in 1990
#2257
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kieran Gardner
Post · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Roberts
Marian · 2006-07
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Kundinger
Beloit · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.