← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Frasca Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-18 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 58 15 19 34 0.586 0.3391 0.3690 1.5062 1.6388
2023-24 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 44 15 17 32 0.727 0.4207 0.4376 1.8688 1.9439
2024-25 Erie Otters OHL 65 15 23 38 0.585 0.3382 0.3343 1.5021 1.4850
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 68 24 30 54 0.794 0.4594 0.4310 2.0404 1.9144
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8638
Forward overall
#265
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2017-18
0.55
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
BCHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
BCHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
BCHL 2014-15
0.22
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.