IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 25 0 7 7 0.280 0.0258 0.0256 0.0641 0.0636
2016-17 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 36 1 12 13 0.361 0.0333 0.0311 0.0827 0.0772
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#24617
Defenseman overall
#2717
Defenseman born in 1996
#1161
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic Granato
Tufts · 2011-12
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Edens
Fredonia · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Bullock
Canton · 2023-24
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.