IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Edens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-05-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 St. Albert Steel AJHL 59 0 7 7 0.119 0.0398 0.0407 0.1098 0.1124
2008-09 St. Albert Steel AJHL 57 1 13 14 0.246 0.0824 0.0809 0.2273 0.2231
2009-10 St. Albert Steel AJHL 58 1 10 11 0.190 0.0636 0.0592 0.1755 0.1633
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 25 0 2 2 0.080
2010-11 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 28 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23543
Defenseman overall
#1861
Defenseman born in 1989
#2486
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Leistner
Western New England · 2014-15
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Cryer
Neumann · 2003-04
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Bina
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.