IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Declan Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-10 Country: USA
Aurora
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kents Hill NE-Prep 30 5 4 9 0.300 0.0603 0.0603 0.1372 0.1372
2023-24 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 20 2 3 5 0.250 0.1019 0.1079 0.2001 0.2119
2024-25 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 43 18 14 32 0.744 0.3034 0.3077 0.5955 0.6040
2025-26 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 52 20 43 63 1.212 0.4939 0.4744 0.9694 0.9311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
52%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5619
Forward overall
#165
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Aurora Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mike Mikulan
0.82
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Simon Boyko
1.04
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Landry Schmuck
1.57
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Hassan Akl
0.93
actual FR PPG at Aurora

D2/3 Comparables

Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxim Maziarchuk
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.