IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Beswick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Manhattanville
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 50 14 36 50 1.000 0.4077 0.4139 0.8038 0.8161
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3896
Forward overall
#47
Forward born in 2006
#27
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Baillargeon
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Olson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

Manhattanville Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dan Law
0.73
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Dillon Henningson
0.76
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Billy Foulds
0.64
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Lucas Van Natter
0.86
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Park
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Pearson
Concordia · 2014-15
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.