IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Rugg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-18 Country: USA
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 33 4 15 19 0.576 0.1141 0.1141 0.2623 0.2623
2025-26 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 53 20 28 48 0.906 0.3693 0.3520 0.7280 0.6939
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
50%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9561
Forward overall
#402
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Egan Schmitt
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
Michael Stevens
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
Matt Wiesner
0.88
actual FR PPG at Babson
Reid Pehrkon
0.24
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Wilson
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.