IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Dey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-02 Country: USA
Curry
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New England Wolves |EHLP / Elite| EHLP 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.1147 0.1281 0.2254 0.2517
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 10 35 45 1.000 0.2310 0.2362 0.4893 0.5003
2025-26 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 34 9 31 40 1.177 0.4797 0.4582 0.9457 0.9033
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
50%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4490
Forward overall
#102
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Curry Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Taurin Haddon-Harris
0.45
actual FR PPG at Curry
Ross Enmark
1.31
actual FR PPG at Curry
R.J. Kleiman
0.62
actual FR PPG at Curry
Adam Valadao
0.73
actual FR PPG at Curry

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Beau Orser
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.