IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ayzek Waldron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-09 Country: USA
Misericordia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — NCDC 44 12 7 19 0.432 0.1760 0.1726 0.3471 0.3405
2025-26 Boston Dogs NCDC 48 5 3 8 0.167 0.0680 0.0630 0.1340 0.1242
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33632
Forward overall
#2017
Forward born in 2005
#1187
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Misericordia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Justin Beers
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Ryan Karbach
0.40
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Colin Stow
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Aidan Gallagher
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Scarbrough
Assumption · 2024-25
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Deschamps
Nichols · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Rochinsky
Aurora · 2016-17
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.