← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-08 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1438 0.3443 0.4037
2022-23 Sarnia Sting OHL 23 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Kitchener Rangers OHL 58 0 8 8 0.138 0.0798 0.0842 0.3543 0.3739
2024-25 Kitchener Rangers OHL 65 3 25 28 0.431 0.2492 0.2501 1.1069 1.1109
2025-26 Kitchener Rangers OHL 51 2 16 18 0.353 0.2042 0.1947 0.9068 0.8645
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7417
Defenseman overall
#1568
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2017-18
0.32
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
BCHL 2012-13
0.25
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
BCHL 2020-21
0.11
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
USHL 2014-15
0.15
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.