← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kieran Witkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-07 Country: Canada
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brampton Steelheads OHL 58 3 4 7 0.121 0.0698 0.0760 0.3101 0.3376
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 68 12 18 30 0.441 0.2552 0.2647 1.1337 1.1757
2025-26 Brampton Steelheads OHL 62 14 20 34 0.548 0.3172 0.3130 1.4091 1.3904
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22457
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 2007
#871
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at RPI
USHL 2015-16
0.54
actual FR PPG at RPI
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at RPI
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

King's · 2018-19
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.