IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kieran Witkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-07 Country: Canada
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brampton Steelheads OHL 58 3 4 7 0.121 0.0698 0.0760 0.3160 0.3440
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 68 12 18 30 0.441 0.2552 0.2647 1.1552 1.1980
2025-26 Brampton Steelheads OHL 62 14 20 34 0.548 0.3172 0.3130 1.4359 1.4168
2026-27 Brampton Steelheads OHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22775
Forward overall
#741
Forward born in 2007
#898
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Danny Ciccarello
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at RPI
Luke Goukler
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI
Harrison Lodewyk
WHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI
Jake Gagnon
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

Jory McWilliams
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.