← New Search ↗ Social Card

Danny Ciccarello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Marks NE-Prep 28 16 12 28 1.000 0.2821 0.2821 0.4576 0.4576
2019-20 St. Marks NE-Prep 27 26 23 49 1.815 0.5120 0.5120 0.8305 0.8305
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 18 3 4 7 0.389 0.1449 0.1449 0.5667 0.5667
2021-22 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 27 4 6 10 0.370 0.1380 0.1264 0.5397 0.4943
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 28 1 1 2 0.071
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 33 1 4 5 0.151
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC 25 4 1 5 0.200
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC 24 1 1 2 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · RPI
-65.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31137
Forward overall
#1652
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.