| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | St. Marks | NE-Prep | 28 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 1.000 | 0.2821 | 0.2821 | 0.4576 | 0.4576 |
| 2019-20 | St. Marks | NE-Prep | 27 | 26 | 23 | 49 | 1.815 | 0.5120 | 0.5120 | 0.8305 | 0.8305 |
| 2020-21 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.389 | 0.1449 | 0.1449 | 0.5667 | 0.5667 |
| 2021-22 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 27 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.370 | 0.1380 | 0.1264 | 0.5397 | 0.4943 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | SR | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.071 |
| 2024-25 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | — | 33 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.151 |
| 2023-24 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 25 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2022-23 | RPI | D1 | ECAC | — | 24 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.083 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.