IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Fairman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Northern Cyclones NCDC 46 5 10 15 0.326 0.1330 0.1320 0.2621 0.2601
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 20 33 53 1.767
2024-25 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 20 33 53 1.767
2023-24 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 20 33 53 1.767
2022-23 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 20 33 53 1.767
2021-22 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 20 33 53 1.767
2020-21 Indiana University of Pennsylvania ACHA_D1 — — 30 20 33 53 1.767

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28500
Forward overall
#1640
Forward born in 2003
#1028
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie Davis
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Edwards
Tufts · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.