IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 47 3 5 8 0.170 0.0632 0.0645 0.1802 0.1839
2009-10 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 44 1 18 19 0.432 0.1603 0.1571 — —
2010-11 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 57 1 20 21 0.368 0.1368 0.1271 0.3901 0.3625
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 23 3 7 10 0.435
2013-14 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 24 3 8 11 0.458
2012-13 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 24 4 9 13 0.542
2011-12 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 25 3 12 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2011-12 · Tufts
+357.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9053
Defenseman overall
#1300
Defenseman born in 1990
#3897
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex D'Oliveira
SUNY Oswego · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Rielly
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerry Laakso
UMass Dartmouth · 2013-14
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.