← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Rielly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 2 6 8 0.154 0.0599 0.0664 0.2243 0.2485
2001-02 Surrey Eagles BCHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0486 0.0512 0.1823 0.1919
2002-03 Surrey Eagles BCHL 40 6 14 20 0.500 0.1946 0.1964 0.7291 0.7359
2003-04 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 11 34 45 0.776 0.3020 0.2914 1.1315 1.0917
2004-05 Surrey Eagles BCHL 51 8 29 37 0.726 0.2824 0.2593 1.0580 0.9715
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 SR 7 1 1 2 0.286
2007-08 Manhattanville D3 JR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2006-07 SUNY Brockport D3 SO 24 2 4 6 0.250
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2005-06 · SUNY Brockport
+114.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12922
Forward overall
#446
Forward born in 1984
#1057
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.