IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lawson Sorokan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0532 0.0547 0.1048 0.1077
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 25 4 6 10 0.400
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 25 4 6 10 0.400
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 25 4 6 10 0.400
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 25 4 6 10 0.400
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 25 4 6 10 0.400
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 25 4 6 10 0.400

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51302
Forward overall
#3513
Forward born in 2005
#1633
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Cremen
Canton · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Faughnan
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Charles
Middlebury · 2011-12
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.