IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Theo Priem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Casper Warbirds NCDC 48 5 6 11 0.229 0.0934 0.0930 0.1834 0.1826
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39476
Forward overall
#2460
Forward born in 2005
#1304
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jameson O'Flynn
Bethel · 2023-24
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tony DeVito
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Nikolopoulos
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.