IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garren Reisweber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 41 6 7 13 0.317 0.0777 0.0842 0.2183 0.2365
2003-04 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 49 20 34 54 1.102 0.2701 0.2804 0.7587 0.7878
2004-05 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.1180 0.1191 0.6007 0.6065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 26 9 9 18 0.692
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 8 4 12 0.462
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 24 15 12 27 1.125
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 12 0 5 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2005-06 · SUNY Oswego
+165.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33837
Forward overall
#1106
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

George Kolovos
Wentworth · 2021-22
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kimball
Lake Forest · 2019-20
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Yoon
Bethel · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.