← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Franssen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-04 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Oshawa Generals OHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2893 0.3039 1.2848 1.3496
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 63 6 6 12 0.191 0.1102 0.1101 0.4895 0.4889
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 64 24 18 42 0.656 0.3796 0.3601 1.6861 1.5994
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19184
Forward overall
#819
Forward born in 2006
#790
in OHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
BCHL 2022-23
0.31
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
BCHL 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
USHL 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.