← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Franssen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-04 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Oshawa Generals OHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2893 0.3039 1.3092 1.3752
2024-25 Oshawa Generals OHL 63 6 6 12 0.191 0.1102 0.1101 0.4988 0.4982
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 64 24 18 42 0.656 0.3796 0.3601 1.7182 1.6298
2026-27 Oshawa Generals OHL 7 1 3 4 0.571 0.3306 0.3306 1.4962 1.4962
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19484
Forward overall
#841
Forward born in 2006
#819
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NAHL 2020-21
0.08
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.31
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2023-24
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.