← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefan Owens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 41 20 27 47 1.146 0.1066 0.1097 0.2625 0.2702
2018-19 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 44 12 13 25 0.568 0.0745 0.0766 0.1929 0.1982
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 54 12 10 22 0.407 0.1497 0.1497 0.4306 0.4306
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 56 24 27 51 0.911 0.3346 0.3346 0.9625 0.9625
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 26 2 0 2 0.077
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 34 1 1 2 0.059
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 26 2 0 2 0.077
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 13 1 0 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2021-22 · UMass Lowell
0.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20461
Forward overall
#942
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2010-11
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.