← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolas Cinicola Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 33 0 4 4 0.121 0.0112 0.0112 0.0278 0.0278
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Elite 42 1 5 6 0.143 0.0132 0.0132 0.0327 0.0327
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 19 0 1 1 0.053
2024-25 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 19 0 1 1 0.053
2023-24 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 19 0 1 1 0.053
2022-23 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 19 0 1 1 0.053
2021-22 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 19 0 1 1 0.053
2020-21 Lehigh University ACHA_D1 19 0 1 1 0.053

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30742
Defenseman overall
#2006
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.