IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Blair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Rochester Mustangs USHL 39 0 3 3 0.077 0.0454 0.0476 0.2310 0.2419
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 21 1 1 2 0.095
2004-05 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2003-04 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 26 4 2 6 0.231
2002-03 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 28 3 9 12 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2002-03 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+854.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26674
Defenseman overall
#1259
Defenseman born in 1982
#4178
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kasper Kjellkvist
Curry · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mood
Chatham · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.