← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alessandro Di Iorio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-17 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 3, Pick #94  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sarnia Sting OHL 58 11 27 38 0.655 0.3790 0.4140 1.7156 1.8740
2025-26 Sarnia Sting OHL 45 12 19 31 0.689 0.3985 0.4153 1.8038 1.8797
2026-27 Sarnia Sting OHL 6 3 5 8 1.333 0.7713 0.7713 3.4911 3.4911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9841
Forward overall
#117
Forward born in 2008
#495
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.71 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2016-17
0.34
actual FR PPG at Boston University
SHL-J20 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2014-15
0.41
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2014-15
0.77
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.