← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Wellenreiter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-17 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 BCHL 38 7 6 13 0.342 0.1318 0.1406 0.4979 0.5310
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 45 11 16 27 0.600 0.3471 0.3431 1.5417 1.5239
2025-26 North Bay Battalion OHL 68 23 33 56 0.824 0.4764 0.4469 2.1160 1.9851
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9678
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2012-13
0.33
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
USHL 2014-15
0.62
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NCDC 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NAHL 2016-17
0.56
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.