← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kohyn Eshkawkogan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-11-19 Country: Canada
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Ottawa 67's OHL 52 4 16 20 0.385 0.2225 0.2506 1.0070 1.1340
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 68 8 45 53 0.779 0.4509 0.4851 2.0408 2.1956
2026-27 Ottawa 67's OHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2330
Defenseman overall
#163
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2022-23
0.23
actual FR PPG at Penn State
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.30
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2016-17
0.36
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2000-01
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.