IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luca Diplacido Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-11 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 1 0 2 2 2.000 1.1570 1.2920 5.1390 5.7387
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0643 0.0686 0.2855 0.3045
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Anthony Walsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Suda
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Hudson Gorski
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Dan Wedman
AJHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Tim Rego
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Wood
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Carlson
Nichols · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.