IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Emery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Seacoast Spartans EHL 34 1 3 4 0.118 0.0272 0.0272 0.0575 0.0575
2021-22 Seacoast Spartans EHL 46 0 12 12 0.261 0.0603 0.0594 0.1277 0.1258
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 10 13 0.406
2024-25 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 10 13 0.406
2023-24 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 10 13 0.406
2022-23 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 10 13 0.406
2021-22 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 10 13 0.406
2020-21 University of Michigan-Dearborn ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 10 13 0.406

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22171
Defenseman overall
#3223
Defenseman born in 2001
#2594
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Coyne
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtiss Sturgeon
Hamilton · 2024-25
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Giovanni Ursillo
Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.185 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.