← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Jubran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Millbrook NE-Prep 32 5 9 14 0.438 0.0844 0.0844 0.2002 0.2002
2020-21 Millbrook NE-Prep 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0964 0.0964 0.2288 0.2288
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHL 40 3 17 20 0.500 0.0732 0.0748 0.2452 0.2506
2022-23 Seahawks Hockey EHL 46 5 40 45 0.978 0.1431 0.1388 0.4797 0.4653
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 19 6 15 21 1.105
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 19 6 15 21 1.105
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 19 6 15 21 1.105
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 19 6 15 21 1.105
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 19 6 15 21 1.105
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 19 6 15 21 1.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2020-21 · SUNY Oswego
+1286.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4703
Defenseman overall
#1231
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.