IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Low Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Dukes EHL 45 10 7 17 0.378 0.1329 0.1373 0.1852 0.1914
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2025-26 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 13 0 3 3 0.231
2024-25 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2024-25 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 13 0 3 3 0.231
2023-24 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2023-24 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 13 0 3 3 0.231
2022-23 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2022-23 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 13 0 3 3 0.231
2021-22 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2021-22 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 13 0 3 3 0.231
2020-21 Delaware ACHA_D1 — — 34 7 11 18 0.529
2020-21 RIT ACHA_D1 — — 13 0 3 3 0.231

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39891
Forward overall
#2495
Forward born in 2003
#1608
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bob Bruski
St. John's · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Cooper
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Lindsay
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.