← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas McKay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHLP 42 7 32 39 0.929 0.1065 0.1070 0.2093 0.2103
2022-23 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 43 2 4 6 0.140 0.0322 0.0326 0.0683 0.0692
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 0 2 2 0.065
2024-25 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 0 2 2 0.065
2023-24 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 0 2 2 0.065
2022-23 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 0 2 2 0.065
2021-22 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 0 2 2 0.065
2020-21 West Chester University ACHA_D1 31 0 2 2 0.065

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16912
Defenseman overall
#3055
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2018-19
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.