IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Kral Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-15 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — EHL 21 0 3 3 0.143 0.0330 0.0333 0.0699 0.0706
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 7 9 0.600
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 7 9 0.600
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 7 9 0.600
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 7 9 0.600
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 7 9 0.600
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 15 2 7 9 0.600

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57745
Forward overall
#4024
Forward born in 2003
#2958
in EHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Riddell
New England College · 2004-05
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley McMains
Post · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rand
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.