IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luka Graziano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-24 Country: Canada
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 7 16 23 0.460 0.1127 0.1283 0.3167 0.3605
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0526 0.0579 0.1985 0.2184
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 62 3 21 24 0.387 0.2239 0.2289 0.9947 1.0168
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8930
Defenseman overall
#1241
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

John Fusco
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Matthew Biotti
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.07
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Jack Bar
USHL 2020-21
0.18
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Ian Moore
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.