IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luka Graziano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-10-24 Country: Canada
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 7 16 23 0.460 0.1127 0.1283 0.3166 0.3604
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0526 0.0579 0.1984 0.2183
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 62 3 21 24 0.387 0.2239 0.2289 1.0136 1.0361
2026-27 Flint Firebirds OHL 6 1 3 4 0.667 0.3857 0.3857 1.7457 1.7457
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9065
Defenseman overall
#1286
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ian Moore
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Harvard
John Fusco
USHL 2020-21
0.08
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Lucas St-Louis
USHL 2023-24
0.33
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Drake Murray
USHL 2024-25
0.21
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Yuel
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Berger
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.