← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colden Lawrence Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-23 Country: USA
Franklin Pierce
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pomfret NE-Prep 26 2 0 2 0.077 0.0152 0.0152 0.0350 0.0350
2024-25 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 40 16 15 31 0.775 0.1790 0.1820 0.3792 0.3856
2025-26 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 49 22 24 46 0.939 0.2169 0.2083 0.4594 0.4412
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22685
Forward overall
#1261
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Franklin Pierce Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.50
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.31
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2008-09
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.